+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 6
FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 54

Thread: Kinism(League of the South)

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    5,580
    Blog Entries
    25

    Re: Kinism(League of the South)

    Quote Originally Posted by CWRWinger View Post
    I do have a theory on what's going on.

    Not a good idea to post on a public forum.
    I'm up for blindly following you - lead on.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    695

    Re: Kinism(League of the South)

    I'm wondering if the newbies were a 'rent-a-crowd' from the Salvation Army and the Rescue Mission. LOL.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    695

    Re: Kinism(League of the South)

    Frank: "I'm up for blindly following you - lead on."

    No, No! Analyze everything.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,762

    Re: Kinism(League of the South)

    Perhaps, like the Phoenix, something will get revived out of these on going "Tea Parties"?...............A third party?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    5,580
    Blog Entries
    25

    Re: Kinism(League of the South)

    Quote Originally Posted by CWRWinger View Post
    Frank: "I'm up for blindly following you - lead on."

    No, No! Analyze everything.
    I suspect whatever stance you take on the LofS I'd agree on without knowing the details, though yea I'm not only reading folks in here.

    I googled Edgerton - I don't understand the point of attending a Southron org that declares blacks Southron. Secede to build our own Babel, what? The CofCC's probably the best.

    I like what I read from Dr. Hill, Dr. Tuggle, and probably others in there though.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    695

    Re: Kinism(League of the South)

    Frank: "Secede to build our own Babel, what?"

    I agree. I can't stand compromise.

    Ya see where CWNY and SWB support the return of a godly, principled monarchy?

    Rushdoony wanted a theocracy.

    IMO, nothing short of Biblical law is sustainable. Man's organisations and devices will always compromise and fail. (Cursed democracy).

    Biblical law is way easier for all to understand than the USA and IRS Codes.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    695

    Re: Kinism(League of the South)

    "I like what I read from Dr. Hill, Dr. Tuggle, and probably others in there though."

    They sound good as long as they aren't compromising. Most of what they say sounds good.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,762

    Re: Kinism(League of the South)

    How bout a "Meritocracy Republic" with Christian rules and values?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    695

    Re: Kinism(League of the South)

    "How bout a "Meritocracy Republic" with Christian rules and values?"

    Do you have a link?

  10. #30

    Re: Kinism(League of the South)

    Quote Originally Posted by CWRWinger View Post
    Rushdoony wanted a theocracy.
    Actually, Rushdoony believed the Old Republic was a theocracy in essence, based on the Ten Commandments.

    Biblical law is way easier for all to understand than the USA and IRS Codes.
    The theonomists could never explain just what they meant by Biblical Law. They went from the Ten Commandments to Leviticus to Leviticus plus case laws. The OT laws were never intended to survive indefinitely and were never meant to be enforced in the 21st Century.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 6
FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts